Notes from the Classroom: Disruptive Students

Randal Chase

I've chosen to focus my blogs on classroom experiences since my books are intended to be aids to both teachers and students of Gospel Doctrine classes. After 32 years of experience teaching this class, rotating through the entire curriculum 8 times, it's possible I've experienced just about every possible scenario. My post this week refers to an experience in my CES class last week, which consists of 168 eager adults who come out on a Wednesday nights to study the gospel in greater depth than is possible in the 40 minutes afforded us in Gospel Doctrine classes.

Our subject was Abinadi and his teachings to King Noah and his priests. Among those teachings was the notion that we are not saved by obedience to law but rather by the loving grace of our Savior, Jesus Christ. True, we are expected to demonstrate our faith in Christ by our willingness to follow and obey Him, but in the end we can never do enough to "save ourselves" no matter how hard we try or how well we do. Combined with the teachings of King Benjamin about how unprofitable we are despite the best we can do, the lesson tried to make the point that the blessings we receive are not fully earned or deserved. We are much more greatly blessed than our behavior could ever merit.

As I made this point again in my closing testimony of Christ, an older gentlement sitting near the front of the class blurted out, "I don't believe that." No raised hand. No attempt to gain further clarification. Just a spirit of contention and a desire to put me in my place. I said as patiently as I could, "Brother you are not required to believe me, but neither you nor I are going home to our Father without the saving grace of the Lord Jesus Christ," and tried to finish my testimony.

It's an age-old problem for teachers. How do you include class discussion and allow people to share their views and their feelings without turning it into a free-for-all of opinions. We must recognize each person's contribution but never allow false doctrine to go unchallenged or to waste the time of 167 others for the sake of 1 student who behaves disruptively. I meant to speak with him after class, but he very quickly exited. This was his first time attending our class, and I suppose it will be his last. I feel bad about that. But some students do not come to learn. They bring no scriptures, read no passages, and hear only what they want to hear. We must avoid being "teachers with itching ears" who are always more concerned with being loved and accepted than with teaching the truth. It's not a job for the faint-hearted or insecure.

Notes from the Classroom - Book of Mormon Geography

I teach a CES Adult Education class on Wednesday night in St. George, as I have done both here and in Salt Lake City for many years. We currently have 168 students enrolled in the class, which means that there are many interesting questions and discussions every week. This past week the discussion turned to Book of Mormon geography.

As part of our discussion of how the Nephites moved from the Land of Nephi to the city of Zarahemla, I used the map shown here, which was developed by Dr. Daniel Ludlow. It shows the locations of cities and lands relative to each other, as described in the Book of Mormon text. Dr. Ludlow graciously allowed me to use the map in my books, so long as I included his disclaimer that it is not intended to be compared to any particular geographical area.

One sister said, "But how could that be? Didn't all of these things happened in North America?" "Not necessarily," I replied. "We do not know for sure where any of this occured." "But Brigham Young said all of this happened near the Hill Cumorah in New York," she objected. "And other prophets have supported a Mesoamerican or South American location," I responded. "In the end, we simply do not know."

That's an answer that people who have their minds made up do not like, but it happens to be the official position of the Church in these matters. This sister was not one of those with a position to defend--her question was genuine and she wanted to know the answer. In answer to her question, I include a couple of paragraphs from my book, Making Precious Things Plain, Volume 1, p. 53, which is intended to be a study guide for Gospel Doctrine class teachers and students.

"As for what part of America—North America, Central America (Mesoamerica), or South America—the only official statements that have been made by Church authorities say that we do not know. Among scholars and members there are proponents for all three of these theories, and every one of them has a quote or two from an apostle or prophet in support of their claims. What are we to make of such contradictory statements by general authorities and scholars on this topic? The only logical conclusion is that what they are telling us when they make these statements is their opinion (to which they are entitled), but their statements on this topic are not doctrine. If the answer to this question is revealed in the future, we will hear

it from the heads of the Church in an official manner. But this has not yet happened.

"We know a great deal about Arabia today, and we have some pretty good ideas about where Lehi and his family were before sailing to America. I have shared some of that information with you above. But as to precisely where the Lehites landed and lived in America, the jury is still out. There is a lot of fascinating research in this area. I enjoy reading it and I have my own opinions, as many do. But I believe that Gospel Doctrine teachers should be wise enough to admit 'we do not know' if asked where specifically they landed. It is, after all, a gospel doctrine class."

"for behold, my soul delighteth in plainness unto my people

that they may learn"

2 Nephi 25:4